Response of Sugarbeets and Weeds to Phenmedipham and Two Analogues

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Responses of weeds and sugarbeets (Beta vulgarisL.) to postemergence treatments of methylm-hydroxycarbanilatem-methylcarbanilate (phenmedipham) and two analogues were evaluated in six field studies. Phenmedipham at 1.7 kg/ha controlled foxtail millet (Setaria italica(L.) Beauv.) and kochia (Kochia scoparia(L.) Schrad.) better than 2.2 kg/ha of methylm-hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate and ethylm-hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate. Pigweed (Amaranthusspp.) was controlled better by the analogues at 1.1 kg/ha than by phenmedipham. The foliar growth of sugarbeets was generally suppressed more by the analogues than by phenmedipham, but injury was not considered detrimental at 1.1 kg/ha. Yield of sugarbeet roots and sugar was reduced by 7% or less by phenmedipham at rates of 1.1 to 4.5 kg/ha, but these yield reductions were associated primarily with the failure of phenmedipham to completely control all weeds for 5 to 9 weeks after treatment.