The Effects of Surfactant Systems and Moisturizing Products on the Residual Activity of a Chlorhexidine Gluconate Handwash Using a Pigskin Substrate
- 1 February 1990
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 11 (2) , 67-70
- https://doi.org/10.2307/30144264
Abstract
A series of handwashing experiments using a pigskin substrate and Serratia marcescens as the contaminant compared the residual activity of a chlorhexidine detergent handwash product alone and in combination with anionic and nonionic-based moisturizing products and surfactant systems. The anionic based moisturizing products and the anionic surfactant system almost completely destroyed the residual antibacterial activity of the chlorhexidine, while the nonionic-based products had minimal effect.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guideline for use of topical antimicrobial agentsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1988
- Quantity of Soap as a Variable in HandwashingInfection Control, 1987
- Evaluation of the Skin Disinfecting Activity and Cumulative Effect of Chlorhexidine and Triclosan Handwash Preparations on Hands Artificially Contaminated with Serratia marcescensInfection Control, 1987
- The effect of handcream on the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine gluconateJournal of Hospital Infection, 1987
- Pig skin as test substrate for evaluating topical antimicrobial activityJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1986
- Interruption of shigellosis by hand washingTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1982
- HANDWASHING TO PREVENT DIARRHEA IN DAY-CARE CENTERS1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1981