A prospective study of preferences and actual treatment choices in ALS

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether ALS patients’ preferences for ameliorative or life-extending technologies elicited early in the disease were related to later treatment choices. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 121 patients were seen at a tertiary ALS care center and followed for a median of 12 months. At baseline, patient preferences for use of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement were elicited. All patients received the same educational information before being interviewed about treatment preferences. Patients were then followed to determine if patients who viewed the interventions favorably at baseline were significantly more likely to use the interventions over follow-up. Results: Six to twelve percent of patients were certain they wanted tracheostomy and 28.2% wanted PEG. Preferences were related to later treatment choices: 20% of patients who found tracheostomy acceptable had one in the follow-up period, compared with 3.4% of those not in favor (p < 0.001). For PEG, similar findings were obtained: 48.5% who initially found it acceptable had PEG, versus 8.1% of those not in favor of this treatment (p < 0.001). Patients who found the interventions acceptable were more likely to be recently diagnosed, expressed greater attachment to life, and showed greater declines in pulmonary function over follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with ALS were able to express their preferences for life-extending or ameliorative technologies and made choices consistent with these preferences. However, patient preferences may change over time, and clinical education efforts are required throughout the course of disease.