KEPLERINPUT CATALOG: PHOTOMETRIC CALIBRATION AND STELLAR CLASSIFICATION
Top Cited Papers
- 8 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astronomical Journal
- Vol. 142 (4)
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112
Abstract
We describe the photometric calibration and stellar classification methods used by the Stellar Classification Project to produce the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC). The KIC is a catalog containing photometric and physical data for sources in the Kepler mission field of view; it is used by the mission to select optimal targets. Four of the visible-light (g, r, i, z) magnitudes used in the KIC are tied to Sloan Digital Sky Survey magnitudes; the fifth (D51) is an AB magnitude calibrated to be consistent with Castelli & Kurucz (CK) model atmosphere fluxes. We derived atmospheric extinction corrections from hourly observations of secondary standard fields within the Kepler field of view. For these filters and extinction estimates, repeatability of absolute photometry for stars brighter than magnitude 15 is typically 2%. We estimated stellar parameters {T(eff), log(g), log(Z), E(B-V)} using Bayesian posterior probability maximization to match observed colors to CK stellar atmosphere models. We applied Bayesian priors describing the distribution of solar-neighborhood stars in the color-magnitude diagram, in log(Z), and in height above the galactic plane. Several comparisons with samples of stars classified by other means indicate that for 4500 K <= T(eff) <= 6500 K, our classifications are reliable within about +/- 200 K and 0.4 dex in log(g) for dwarfs, with somewhat larger log(g) uncertainties for giants. It is difficult to assess the reliability of our log(Z) estimates, but there is reason to suspect that it is poor, particularly at extreme T(eff). Comparisons between the CK models and observed colors are generally satisfactory with some exceptions, notably for stars cooler than 4500 K. Of great importance for the Kepler mission, for T(eff) <= 5400 K, comparison with asteroseismic results shows that the distinction between main-sequence stars and giants is reliable with about 98% confidence. Larger errors in log(g) occur for warmer stars, for which our filter set provides inadequate gravity diagnostics. The KIC is available through the MAST data archive.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characterization of Kepler early-type targetsPublished by EDP Sciences ,2010
- THE ASTEROSEISMIC POTENTIAL OF KEPLER : FIRST RESULTS FOR SOLAR-TYPE STARSThe Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2010
- ASTEROSEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF KNOWN PLANET HOSTS IN THE KEPLER FIELDThe Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2010
- Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First ResultsScience, 2010
- The Planet‐Metallicity CorrelationThe Astrophysical Journal, 2005
- The Second Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky SurveyThe Astronomical Journal, 2004
- The First Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky SurveyThe Astronomical Journal, 2003
- The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric SystemThe Astronomical Journal, 1996
- The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinctionThe Astrophysical Journal, 1989
- JHKLM photometry - Standard systems, passbands, and intrinsic colorsPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1988