Sharing Antenatal Care: Client Satisfaction and Use of the ‘Patient‐held Record’
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 36 (1) , 11-14
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb02912.x
Abstract
Two hundred women (148 shared care patients and 52 clinic patients) completed a questionnaire about care received during pregnancy and the use of a patient‐held record. Women receiving shared care reported higher levels of satisfaction with their care than clinic patients (p<0.0001). Thirty‐six percent of the women in shared care forgot to take their record to an appointment on at least 1 occasion. During the pregnancy, over half of the respondents in both groups made contact with the hospital for reasons other than for their regular visit. For both groups, convenience was the most frequently reported reason for choosing their model of care. Other important issues for shared care patients were that the service was more personal and more information was provided. Among clinic patients, safety and quality of care were identified as important. Problems involved with the patient holding the only complete pregnancy record are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shared Obstetric Care: The General Practitioner's PerspectiveAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Organization and Early Results of a Shared Antenatal Care ProgrammeAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Shared Antenatal Care in BrisbaneAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- The Newbury Maternity Care Study: a randomized controlled trial to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric recordsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- Should women carry their antenatal records?BMJ, 1986