Gene expression profiling of human aortic endothelial cells exposed to disturbed flow and steady laminar flow

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Subtraction cloning and cDNA arrays were used to compare steady-state mRNA levels in cultured human aortic endothelial cells (HAEC) exposed for up to 24 h to either high-shear (13 dyn/cm2) steady laminar flow (LF), an established representation of “atheroprotective” flow conditions, or low-shear (2), pulsatile, nonsteady, non-unidirectional flow (disturbed flow, DF) that simulates conditions in the atherosclerosis-prone areas of the arterial circulation. More than 100 genes not previously known to be flow regulated were identified. Analysis of selected genes by quantitative RT-PCR confirmed the results obtained from the microarrays. These data demonstrate that DF is not simply the absence of LF but in fact represents a distinct biomechanical stimulus that has a profound impact upon the gene expression profile of HAEC in culture. In line with previous studies, many of the changes in mRNA levels induced by LF are atheroprotective. In contrast, DF upregulated the mRNA levels of a plethora of proatherosclerotic genes including proinflammatory, proapoptotic, and procoagulant molecules. For some of the genes whose expression was altered by DF and LF, corresponding changes in EC function (proliferation and monocyte adhesion) could be demonstrated. Specifically, the sustained upregulation of VCAM-1 and increased monocyte adhesion to EC exposed to DF was similar to that found in EC in vivo at atherosclerosis-prone regions, confirming the relevance of our model system for in vivo conditions. Distinct differences in the cellular response induced by TNFα and DF suggest that the effects of DF are not mediated entirely by the same signaling pathways that activate NF-κB. These studies demonstrate extensive and pathophysiologically relevant changes in sustained gene expression patterns in aortic EC exposed to DF compared with LF which are predicted to induce a proatherogenic EC phenotype.

This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit: