Extraterritorial Jurisdiction at a Crossroads: An Intersection Between Public and Private International Law
- 1 April 1982
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of International Law
- Vol. 76 (2) , 280-320
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2201454
Abstract
Historically, public international law and private international law have been treated as two different legal systems that function more or less independently. Public international law regulates activity among human beings operating in groups called, nation-states, while private international law regulates the activities of smaller subgroups or of individuals as they interact with each other. Since the public international legal system coordinates the interaction of collective human interests through decentralized mechanisms and private international law coordinates the interaction of individual or subgroup interests primarily through centralized mechanisms, these coordinating functions are usually carried out in different forums, each appropriate to the task. The differences between the processes by which sanctions for violation of community norms are applied in the two systems and the differences in the nature of the units making up the communities that establish those norms tend to obscure the fact that both the public and the private international systems coordinate human behavior, and that thus the values that inform both systems must necessarily be the same.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bicentennial Observations on the Second Edition of Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Conflict of LawsThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 1980
- Legislative JurisdictionColumbia Law Review, 1978
- The Comity DoctrineMichigan Law Review, 1966
- Joseph Story's Contribution to American Conflicts Law: A CommentAmerican Journal of Legal History, 1961
- "Public Policy" in the Conflict of LawsColumbia Law Review, 1956
- The Hydrogen Bomb Tests and the International Law of the SeaAmerican Journal of International Law, 1955
- Choice of the Applicable LawColumbia Law Review, 1952
- American Theories of Conflict of Laws: Their Role and UtilityHarvard Law Review, 1945
- Rise and Decline of the Law-of-Nations Doctrine in the Conflict of LawsColumbia Law Review, 1942
- The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of LawsThe Yale Law Journal, 1924