Aspects of cancer immunotherapy
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Immunology & Cell Biology
- Vol. 81 (1) , 79-85
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0818-9641.2002.01140.x
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has traditionally undergone a 'revolution' every decade, from the use of Bacille Calmette-Guérin by scarification in the 1970s, to interleukin-2 therapies in the 1980s, and monoclonal antibody treatments in the early 1990s. Usually the early reports on the use of such agents were encouraging, but when more patients were studied in multiple centres, the initial promising results could not be confirmed. Now in a new century, we have more reagents and methods available than ever before - indeed, with such a plethora of reagents it is difficult to envisage them being fully and appropriately tested within the next decade, by which time there will be even more reagents to test. However, there have been three major advances which should lead to substantial progress in cancer immunotherapy: (1) the widespread use of genetic engineering, enabling identification of candidate vaccine proteins and manipulation of their sequences; (2) the production of antigens, antibodies and cytokines in large amounts by recombinant technologies, and (3) an understanding of the mode of presentation of peptides by major histocompatibility complex Class I and Class II molecules and their recognition by T cells. Despite these advances, there are major problems facing cancer immunotherapy, such as the ability of tumours to mutate and evade the immune system and the difficulty of precisely defining the interactions of effector cells in mediating 'rejection' or destruction of a tumour. There are clearly immunological similarities with diseases such as malaria and schistosomiasis, where the invading foreign organisms can use a variety of strategies to resist an elicited immune response. The failure to find a suitable vaccine for these diseases must lead to some pessimism for the development of immunotherapy for an autologous tumour. However, there are promising studies now in progress which should give an indication of the most important directions to follow. This review provides a commentary on aspects of cancer immunotherapy and in particular will deal with: (1) the selection of antigens as vaccine components; (2) the modes of presentation of antigens, particularly by major histocompatibility complex Class I molecules; and (3) new modes of delivery of vaccine immunogens.Keywords
Funding Information
- American Breast Cancer Foundation (DAMD17‐99‐1‐9067)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transitive functional annotation by shortest-path analysis of gene expression dataProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002
- Rapid Induction of Tumor-specific Type 1 T Helper Cells in Metastatic Melanoma Patients by Vaccination with Mature, Cryopreserved, Peptide-loaded Monocyte-derived Dendritic CellsThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2002
- Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancerNature, 2002
- Secretion of interleukin-10 from murine colon carcinoma cells suppresses systemic antitumor immunity and impairs protective immunity induced against the tumorsCancer Gene Therapy, 2002
- Cytokine Production from Murine CD4 and CD8 Cells After Mannan-MUC1 ImmunizationJournal of Interferon & Cytokine Research, 1999
- Cyclophosphamide Enhances the CTL Precursor Frequency in Mice Imrnunized with MUC1-Mannan Fusion Protein (M-FP)Journal of Immunotherapy, 1998
- MUC1 peptide epitopes associated with five different H‐2 class I moleculesEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1997
- The mannose receptor functions as a high capacity and broad specificity antigen receptor in human dendritic cellsEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1997
- The immunogenicity of MUC1 peptides and fusion proteinCancer Letters, 1995
- Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC moleculesNature, 1991