Metapopulation consequences of site fidelity for colonially breeding mammals and birds
Open Access
- 23 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Animal Ecology
- Vol. 74 (4) , 716-727
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00970.x
Abstract
Summary: Many far‐ranging bird and mammal species aggregate in colonies to breed, and most individuals remain faithful to one colony. Here, we use modelling to explore the consequences of this site fidelity for the metapopulation dynamics of such species. We develop a spatially explicit model of the annual transfer process between colonies. We apply it to different spatial arrangements of 20 identical colonies and thus demonstrate that connectivity alone can, in the short term, give rise to heterogeneity in colony size. We place the annual transfer model within a state‐structured population model and examine the consequences of local and global density dependence for long‐term dynamics. For each scenario, we investigate the implications of the strength of site fidelity, the cost of migration and the population's intrinsic growth rate. Our results suggest that, under local density dependence, site fidelity slows down the colonization process and can temporarily trap the entire population in a subset of the available potential colonies. When site fidelity is strong, the metapopulation follows a step‐like trajectory. Population growth occurs only rarely because individuals must overcome their site‐fidelity to found new colonies. Even though this effect is temporary, it renders the entire metapopulation vulnerable to rare catastrophic collapses. Under global density dependence, site fidelity imposes competition between colonies for the limiting resource. Stochastic events lead to the dominance of certain colonies and the temporary extinction of others. If site fidelity is strong, it can permanently prevent the metapopulation from occupying all available potential colonies. We conclude that, irrespective of the mechanism of population regulation, colonially breeding species that show strong site fidelity are likely to occupy only a portion of the breeding habitat available to them.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- The dynamics of hunted Icelandic goose populations: a reassessment of the evidenceJournal of Applied Ecology, 2004
- Competition for breeding sites and site‐dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalgeJournal of Animal Ecology, 2004
- BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF METAPOPULATION DATAEcology, 2002
- Spatial structure of harbour seal populations and the implications thereofCanadian Journal of Zoology, 2001
- POPULATION GROWTH OF ANTARCTIC FUR SEALS: LIMITATION BY A TOP PREDATOR, THE LEOPARD SEAL?Ecology, 1998
- The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory speciesEvolutionary Ecology, 1997
- Determinants of the Size and Location of Great Blue Heron ColoniesColonial Waterbirds, 1997
- Density Dependence: Are We Searching at the Wrong Spatial Scale?Journal of Animal Ecology, 1996
- Minimum Viable Metapopulation SizeThe American Naturalist, 1996
- Intercolony movement and behaviour of immature Guillemots Uria aalgeIbis, 1993