Towards a hierarchical framework for modelling the spatial distribution of animals
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Biogeography
- Vol. 28 (9) , 1147-1166
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00626.x
Abstract
Aim: A hierarchical framework is presented for modelling the spatial distribution of terrestrial vertebrate animals.Location: The location of the study is the montane ash forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria, south‐eastern Australia.Methods: The framework is illustrated using as a case study the distribution of Leadbeater’s Possum [Gymnobelideus leadbeateri McCoy, 1867, (Marsupialia: Petauridae)], a small arboreal marsupial. The framework is based upon quantifying the environmental response of a species in terms of a five‐level environmental hierarchy defined by scales (global‐, meso‐, topo‐, micro‐ and nano‐scales) that represent natural breaks in the distribution and availability of the primary environmental resources. Animal response is examined in terms of a species’ distribution as observed in four biological units (the species in toto, meta‐population/population, group/colony, and individual organism). We define the spatial occurrence and abundance of the target species in each of these units as its ‘distributional behaviour’.Results: Predictions of the potential spatial distribution of Leadbeater’s Possum are presented at meso‐, topo‐, micro‐ and nano‐scales. These spatial predictions utilize Geographical Information System (GIS)‐based spatial models of long term mean monthly climate and terrain‐modified surface radiation, together with vegetation cover and individual tree attributes from air‐photo interpretation and field survey.Main conclusions: Ideally, species’ responses at each level in the environmental hierarchy should be empirically derived using statistical models based on field observation of a species’ distribution and abundance. Spatial modelling of species’ responses becomes problematic at finer scales because of the lack of suitable environmental data. The key characteristics of the modelling framework are generic, but the influence of additional scales and processes will be important in other ecosystems and species.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors affecting stand structure in forests – are there climatic and topographic determinants?Forest Ecology and Management, 1999
- Calibration and sensitivity analysis of a spatially-distributed solar radiation modelInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1999
- Spatial Autocorrelation in California Land BirdsConservation Biology, 1998
- Modelling the abundance of rare species: statistical models for counts with extra zerosEcological Modelling, 1996
- How spatial and temporal scales influence understanding of Sperm Whale distribution: a reviewMammal Review, 1996
- Modelling the impacts of wildfire on the viability of metapopulations of the endangered Australian species of arboreal marsupial, Leadbeater's PossumForest Ecology and Management, 1995
- Modelling environmental heterogeneity in forested landscapesJournal of Hydrology, 1993
- The abundance and development of cavities in Eucalyptus trees: a case study in the montane forests of Victoria, southeastern AustraliaForest Ecology and Management, 1993
- Characteristics of hollow-bearing trees occupied by arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria, south-east AustraliaForest Ecology and Management, 1991
- Density as a Misleading Indicator of Habitat QualityThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1983