Maternal Morbidity Associated With Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 107 (6) , 1226-1232
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000219750.79480.84
Abstract
Although repeat cesarean deliveries often are associated with serious morbidity, they account for only a portion of abdominal deliveries and are overlooked when evaluating morbidity. Our objective was to estimate the magnitude of increased maternal morbidity associated with increasing number of cesarean deliveries. Prospective observational cohort of 30,132 women who had cesarean delivery without labor in 19 academic centers over 4 years (1999–2002). There were 6,201 first (primary), 15,808 second, 6,324 third, 1,452 fourth, 258 fifth, and 89 sixth or more cesarean deliveries. The risks of placenta accreta, cystotomy, bowel injury, ureteral injury, and ileus, the need for postoperative ventilation, intensive care unit admission, hysterectomy, and blood transfusion requiring 4 or more units, and the duration of operative time and hospital stay significantly increased with increasing number of cesarean deliveries. Placenta accreta was present in 15 (0.24%), 49 (0.31%), 36 (0.57%), 31 (2.13%), 6 (2.33%), and 6 (6.74%) women undergoing their first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth or more cesarean deliveries, respectively. Hysterectomy was required in 40 (0.65%) first, 67 (0.42%) second, 57 (0.90%) third, 35 (2.41%) fourth, 9 (3.49%) fifth, and 8 (8.99%) sixth or more cesarean deliveries. In the 723 women with previa, the risk for placenta accreta was 3%, 11%, 40%, 61%, and 67% for first, second, third, fourth, and fifth or more repeat cesarean deliveries, respectively. Because serious maternal morbidity increases progressively with increasing number of cesarean deliveries, the number of intended pregnancies should be considered during counseling regarding elective repeat cesarean operation versus a trial of labor and when debating the merits of elective primary cesarean delivery. II-2Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vaginal Birth after Cesarean RevisitedNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Multiple cesarean section morbidityInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2004
- Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous proceduresEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2003
- The Risks of Lowering the Cesarean-Delivery RateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Caesarean sectionCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Sequelae of repeat cesarean sectionsInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1996
- Are multiple cesarean sections safe?European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1994
- Is there a risk of lower segment scar rupture in pregnancy after multiple caesarean sections?Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Multiple caesarean sections: outcomes and complicationsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1988
- Maternal mortality rate associated with cesarean section: An appraisalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980