Limitations of Claims and Registry Data in Surgical Oncology Research
Top Cited Papers
- 7 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 15 (2) , 415-423
- https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9658-3
Abstract
Studies based on large population-based data sets, such as administrative claims data and tumor registry data, have become increasingly common in surgical oncology research. These data sets can be...Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection BiasJAMA, 2007
- The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical dataStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- BiasJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- Rare Outcomes, Common Treatments: Analytic Strategies Using Propensity ScoresAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Can Administrative Data Be Used to Compare Postoperative Complication Rates Across Hospitals?Medical Care, 2002
- Administrative Data for Public Health Surveillance and PlanningAnnual Review of Public Health, 2001
- Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity ScoresAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgeryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983