Frequent measurement of chronic pain: an electronic diary and empirical findings
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in PAIN®
- Vol. 60 (3) , 341-347
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)00143-3
Abstract
O studies suggesting that PIPER pain ratings have good reliability, and good validity assessed against the VAS. In a third study, the PIPER was found practical for use by elderly subjects, and for periods of more than 2 months. In addition, PIPER pain ratings taken 4 times per day were found to have different properties than 4 other measures of chronic pain, suggesting that very frequent measures should be taken if a full understanding of chronic pain is to be obtained. ∗Corresponding author: Dr. Geoff Cumming, School of Psychology, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3083, Australia. E-mail: cumming@latcs1.lat.oz.au 1Tel:. (613) 479-2820; FAX: (613) 479-2443 (Received 30 March 1994; accepted 8 July 1994.) © Lippincott-Raven Publishers....Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE COMPARATIVE ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION AND A NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUG FOR PAINFUL OSTEOARTHRITISRheumatology, 1994
- Effects of present pain level on recall of chronic pain and medication usePain, 1993
- Memory for pain: a reviewPain, 1990
- The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methodsPain, 1975