A reconsideration of Dative Movements (1972)
- 3 October 2013
- book chapter
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
Abstract
The standard analyses of the dative generally postulate two similar Dative Movement rules, one of which applies to to-indirect objects and the other to for-indirect objects. This chapter shows how to improve this analysis within the framework of traditional transformational rules. It demonstrates that constraints imposed by the hearer’s perceptual strategy for interpreting sentences play a part in the unacceptability of certain constructions. These constraints are used to account for the remaining anomalies in the dative shift paradigms.Keywords
This publication has 125 references indexed in Scilit:
- Representational complexity and memory retrieval in language comprehensionLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 2011
- English relative clause constructionsJournal of Linguistics, 1997
- UNERGATIVES AS COPULAR VERBS; LOCATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL PREDICATIONThe Linguistic Review, 1990
- COMPLEX INVERSION IN FRENCHProbus, 1989
- On focus inversion: syntactic valence and the role of a SUBCAT listLinguistics, 1989
- The suffixing preference: a processing explanationLinguistics, 1985
- Stress and Focus in EnglishLanguage, 1983
- On the Constituency of InfinitivesLanguage, 1982
- COMPLEMENTIZER - TRACE PHENOMENA AND THE NOMINATIVE ISLAND CONDITIONThe Linguistic Review, 1982
- Indirect Object Constructions in English and the Ordering of TransformationsLanguage, 1968