Results of a Clinical Trial of Clinafloxacin Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin for Intraabdominal Infections
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 233 (1) , 79-87
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200101000-00013
Abstract
Clinafloxacin is a novel quinolone with wide activity against the plethora of microorganisms encountered in intraabdominal infections. This trial was performed to examine its clinical efficacy. Clinafloxacin is representative of a new class of quinolones with considerable antimicrobial activity resulting from their mechanisms of action and pharmacodynamics. There is, however, concern about specific potential toxicities, including photosensitivity. This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to compare clinafloxacin with imipenem/cilastatin as adjuncts in the management of complicated intraabdominal infections. Five hundred twenty-nine patients were included in the intent-to-treat population, with 312 meeting all criteria for the valid population. Patients with a wide range of infections were enrolled; perforated or abscessed appendicitis was the most common (approximately 50%). One hundred twenty-three of the 150 valid patients treated with clinafloxacin (82%) had successful outcomes, as did 130 of the 162 (80%) treated with imipenem. For the intent-to-treat groups, 219 of 259 patients treated with clinafloxacin (85%) had successful outcomes, as did 219 of 270 patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin (81%). Treatment failure occurred in 39 patients who underwent drainage. There were substantially more gram-negative organisms recovered from the patients with treatment failure who were initially treated with imipenem/cilastatin. The results of this study clearly demonstrate the safety and efficacy of clinafloxacin in the treatment of a range of intraabdominal infections, and in patients with a broad range of physiologic disturbances.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- In Vitro Susceptibility of Anaerobes to Quinolones in the United StatesClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Biapenem versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Report from a Swedish Study GroupScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections requiring surgeryEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1993
- General Guidelines for the Clinical Evaluation of Anti-Infective Drug ProductsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Evaluation of New Anti-Infective Drugs for the Treatment of Intraabdominal InfectionsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Antibiotic Treatment for Surgical PeritonitisAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- Results of a Multicenter Trial Comparing Imipenem/Cilastatin to Tobramycin/Clindamycin for Intra-abdominal InfectionsAnnals of Surgery, 1990
- Matched Case-Control Study of Adjusted versus Nonadjusted Gentamicin Dosing in Perforated and Gangrenous AppendicitisTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1986
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- Perforated and Gangrenous Appendicitis: An Analysis of Antibiotic FailuresThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1983