An Empirical Comparison of Two Methods for Testing the Significance of a Correlation Matrix
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 43 (1) , 11-14
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448304300102
Abstract
The computation of classical ?72 (reflecting SS(Total) in the denominator) as a measure of strength of association in ANOVA designs from published research reports is often impossible because of insufficient information. Cohen's formula for q2 based on the F-test and relevant degrees of freedom yields classical 7)2 only in one way designs. Use of Cohen's formula in more complex multifactor designs yields a measure of partial 7q2. This paper reviews the distinctions between classical and partial q and derives a formula for use in those complex ANOVA designs in which the investigator desires a measure of classical 7)2 and has access only to the F-tests and relevant degrees of freedom.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- On the Extraction of Components and the Applicability of the Factor ModelAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1973
- On the interpretation of factor analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Derivation of Theory by Means of Factor Analysis or Tom Swift and His Electric Factor Analysis MachineThe American Statistician, 1967
- Some Empirical Results Concerning the Power of Bartlett’s Test of the Significance of a Correlation MatrixAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1967
- Statistical methods in factor analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1959
- A Note on the Generation of Random Normal DeviatesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958
- TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSISBritish Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1950