Of that which we cannot write: Some notes on the phenomenology of media
- 1 February 1988
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quarterly Journal of Speech
- Vol. 74 (1) , 71-101
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638809383829
Abstract
The advent of electronic media has fostered recognition of a deterministic relationship among media and communicative behavior: what we communicate about, how we communicate about it, and why we do are all bound up in the nature of the media we use to do so. This essay surveys these three issues across oral, literate, and video media to suggest how literate biases may hinder our mastery of oral and video media. Two critical examples of contemporary rhetoric are presented to illustrate the case. Much of the current difficulty can be eased, it is argued, through distinguishing oral literacy, video literacy, and video orality. Of special interest are the ways in which literacy inhibits the contemporary use, teaching, and study of rhetoric in speech and video.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kenneth Burke and Susanne K. Langer on drama and its audienceQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1986
- Providing feedback: The research on effective oral and written feedback strategiesCentral States Speech Journal, 1985
- With the benefit of hindsight: Reflections on uses and gratifications researchCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1984
- Writing as sophistry: From preservation to persuasionQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1982
- Orality and LiteracyPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1982
- Literacy and Orality in Our timesJournal of Communication, 1980
- An ontological basis for a modern theory of the composing processQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1978
- Tradition and theory in rhetoricQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1976
- On conceptual and empirical treatments of feedback in human communicationCommunication Monographs, 1976
- The second personaQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1970