Two year follow-up after primary PCI with a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (the PASSION trial): a follow-up study
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- Published by Europa Digital & Publishing in EuroIntervention
- Vol. 4 (1) , 64-70
- https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv4i1a12
Abstract
The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paclitaxel-Eluting versus Uncoated Stents in Primary Percutaneous Coronary InterventionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Sirolimus-Eluting versus Uncoated Stents in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patientsEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- A Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Primary stent implantation compared with primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trialsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Long-Term Benefit of Primary Angioplasty as Compared with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative reviewJAMA, 1997