Use of corticosteroids in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis*
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 37 (5) , 1594-1603
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819fb507
Abstract
Controversy remains as to whether low-dose corticosteroids can reduce the mortality and morbidity of acute lung injury (ALI) or the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) without increasing the risk of adverse reactions. We aimed to evaluate all studies investigating prolonged corticosteroids in low-to-moderate dose in ALI or ARDS. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Content, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and bibliographies of retrieved articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reported in any language that used 0.5–2.5 mg·kg−1·d−1 of methylprednisolone or equivalent to treat ALI/ARDS. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and included study design, patient characteristics, interventions, and mortality and morbidity outcomes. Both cohort studies (five studies, n = 307) and RCTs (four trials, n = 341) showed a similar trend toward mortality reduction (RCTs relative risk 0.51, 95% CI 0.24–1.09; p = 0.08; cohort studies relative risk 0.66, 95% CI 0.43–1.02; p = 0.06). The overall relative risk was 0.62 (95% CI 0.43–0.91; p = 0.01). There was also improvement in length of ventilation-free days, length of intensive care unit stay, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Score, Lung Injury Scores, and improvement in Pao2/Fio2. There was no increase in infection, neuromyopathy, or any major complications. There was significant heterogeneity in the pooled studies. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed that heterogeneity had minimal effect on treatment efficacy; however, these findings were limited by the small number of studies used in the analyses. The use of low-dose corticosteroids was associated with improved mortality and morbidity outcomes without increased adverse reactions. The consistency of results in both study designs and all outcomes suggests that they are an effective treatment for ALI or ARDS. The mortality benefits in early ARDS should be confirmed by an adequately powered randomized trial.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methylprednisolone Infusion in Early Severe ARDSChest, 2007
- Do glucocorticoids decrease mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome? A meta‐analysisRespirology, 2007
- Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroids for Persistent Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Lung InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care unitsIntensive Care Medicine, 2003
- Effect of Prolonged Methylprednisolone Therapy in Unresolving Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeJAMA, 1998
- Ineffectiveness of High-dose Methylprednisolone in Preventing Parenchymal Lung Injury and Improving Mortality in Patients with Septic ShockAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1988
- High-Dose Corticosteroids in Patients with the Adult Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Early Methylprednisolone Treatment for Septic Syndrome and the Adult Respiratory Distress SyndromeChest, 1987
- Early Steroid Therapy for Respiratory FailureArchives of Surgery, 1985