Ova & parasite examination practices: Results of survey
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Microbiology Newsletter
- Vol. 22 (12) , 92-96
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-4399(00)89073-x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Utility of Multiple-Stool-Specimen Ova and Parasite Examinations in a High-Prevalence SettingJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1999
- Screening stools for Giardia and Cryptosporidium: Are antigen tests enough?Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1996
- Pros and cons of using preservatives for O & P fecal specimensClinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1995
- How Many Stool Examinations are Necessary to Detect Pathogenic Intestinal Protozoa?The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1995
- Comparison of conventional stool concentration and preserved-smear methods with Merifluor Cryptosporidium/Giardia Direct Immunofluorescence Assay and ProSpecT Giardia EZ Microplate Assay for detection of Giardia lambliaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1995
- Evaluation of intestinal protozoan morphology in polyvinyl alcohol preservative: comparison of zinc sulfate- and mercuric chloride-based compounds for use in Schaudinn's fixativeJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1993
- Comparison of pooled formalin-preserved fecal specimens with three individual samples for detection of intestinal parasitesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1993
- Application of rejection criteria for stool ovum and parasite examinationsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1992
- Cost containment of formalin-preserved stool specimens for ova and parasites from outpatientsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1988
- Evaluation of intestinal parasite morphology in polyvinyl alcohol preservative: comparison of copper sulfate and mercuric chloride bases for use in Schaudinn fixativeJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1983