The use of shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Urology
- Vol. 14 (2) , 117-121
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00042307-200403000-00012
Abstract
Shock wave lithotripsy has been considered a mainstay of therapy for renal calculi for the last 20 years. Shock wave lithotripsy is noninvasive and requires the least anesthesia of the treatment modalities for treatment of renal calculi and therein lies its popularity. In the last decade, however, there have been changes in thinking regarding methods of patient selection for shock wave lithotripsy, changes in the technique of the existing shock wave lithotriptors and new technologies designed to increase the efficacy of shock wave lithotriptors. New studies have shown that shock wave lithotripsy may be less effective than other modalities for treating lower pole stones. Other existing technologies, such as computerized tomography, are being used to more effectively select patients for shock wave lithotripsy. Ongoing studies are evaluating changing the shock wave rate to increase stone fragmentation. In addition, efforts are being made to improve lithotripsy by designing more effective lithotriptors. Shock wave lithotripsy has become a widely used modality for treating renal calculi due to its noninvasive nature and ease of application. Although success rates are reasonable, there is room for improvement. With appropriate patient selection, significant improvements in stone-free rates may be achieved. It is anticipated that, with further research, improvements in lithotriptor design will result in higher treatment success rates with reduced renal trauma and improved patient comfort.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hounsfield Units on Computerized Tomography Predict Stone-Free Rates After Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 2003
- Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continuesBMC Urology, 2003
- Stone Fragmentation During Shock Wave Lithotripsy is Improved by Slowing the Shock Wave Rate: Studies With a New Animal ModelJournal of Urology, 2002
- Predictors of Lower Pole Renal Stone Clearance After Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 2002
- LOWER POLE I: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY FOR LOWER POLE NEPHROLITHIASIS—INITIAL RESULTSJournal of Urology, 2001
- Lower-Pole Caliceal Stone Clearance after Shockwave Lithotripsy, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Flexible Ureteroscopy: Impact of Radiographic Spatial AnatomyJournal of Endourology, 1998
- EFFICACY AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR SOLITARY LOWER POLE RENAL CALCULIJournal of Urology, 1998
- Renal Trauma and the Risk of Long-Term Complications in Shock Wave LithotripsyNephron, 1997
- Management of Lower Pole Nephrolithiasis: A Critical AnalysisJournal of Urology, 1994
- IntroductionJournal of Urology, 1989