Response-Shift Bias
- 1 February 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 4 (1) , 93-106
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8000400105
Abstract
Evaluations of experimental interventions which employ self-report measures are subject to an instrumentation-related source of contamination known as response-shift bias. The difficulty arises when the experimental intervention changes the subject's evaluation standard with regard to the dimension measured with the self-report instrument. In such cases even the true experimental designs (Designs 4, 5, and 6; Campbell and Stanlev, 1963) can provide internally invalid results. Retrospective pretest ratings are recommended as one way in which response-shift bias might be attenuated. Research demonstrating re sponse-shift effects and the superiority of retrospective ratings over tradittonal self-report pretest ratings in providing a measure of change is reviewed. Finally, the current status of retrospection in psychological research is reviewed, and issues are considered for future research needed to identify the unique strengths and limitations of retrospective approaches.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Response-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Internal Invalidity in Pretest-Posttest Self-Report Evaluations and a Re-evaluation of Retrospective PretestsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1979
- Retrospective Pretesting in the Cognitive DomainEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- Chronic mental patient: Current status future directions.Psychological Bulletin, 1969
- The Evaluation of PsychotherapyPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 1964
- Self ratings of fear in a fear-invoking situation.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956