A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 177 (3) , 612-618
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70154-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): Randomized comparisonAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- A Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Induction of LabourGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 1995
- Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agentBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 in a controlled-release vaginal pessary for cervical ripening at termAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1969