Accurate repositioning of the human thumb against unpredictable dynamic loads is dependent upon peripheral feed‐back
- 1 June 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 327 (1) , 393-407
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014238
Abstract
The strategy of accurate movement of the human thumb was studied in 9 subjects. An open-loop hypothesis, which states that a new final position is defined by resetting the agonist/antagonist spring constants, was tested. Subjects were trained to flex the top joint of the thumb rapidly through 20.degree. in .apprx. 1/3 s from a fixed starting position against a load. Occasionally, and unpredictably, the viscous friction of the load was altered prior to its being moved. The spring hypothesis predicts that such a change in load should have no effect on final position accuracy. Under normal conditions no final position error developed when the viscous friction was increased. A small overshoot occurred when the viscous friction was increased. A small overshoot occurred when the viscous friction was descreased. Electromyogram [EMG] recorded from surface electrodes over the belly of flexor pollicis longus in the forearm revealed an increase in activity in response to an increase in viscous friction and a decrease in activity when the viscous friction was reduced. When the joint and cutaneous afferents from the thumb were anesthetized, the EMG response to a change in viscous friction was severely attenuated and consistent final position errors developed. Even though the compensatory open-loop muscle properties went some way towards maintaining accuracy, the change in final position error that occurred as a result of thumb anesthesia correlated well (r = 0.84) with the amount of muscle EMG response that was lost. The latency of the EMG response to a change in viscous friction was compared to that of a voluntary response by asking the subject to push down or let go upon perception of the load change. Approximately the first 100 ms of the EMG response was unaffected by the voluntary intervention of the subject. The spring hypothesis does not explain human thumb movement. The long-latency stretch reflex machinery is responsible for some automatic compensation for unexpected interference with movement.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1980
- Effect of thumb anaesthesia on weight perception, muscle activity and the stretch reflex in man.The Journal of Physiology, 1979
- The sensory mechanism of servo action in human muscle.The Journal of Physiology, 1977
- Servo action in the human thumb.The Journal of Physiology, 1976
- Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head positionJournal of Neurophysiology, 1976
- Servo Action in Human Voluntary MovementNature, 1972
- Intrinsic Feedback Factors Producing Inertial Compensation in MuscleBiophysical Journal, 1967
- Signal-handling characteristics of load-moving skeletal muscleAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1966
- Modifications of neural output signals by muscles: a frequency response studyJournal of Applied Physiology, 1965
- The relation between force and velocity in human muscleThe Journal of Physiology, 1949