The Politics of Intimacy: Costs and Benefits Determining Disclosure Intimacy in Male-Female Dyads
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
- Vol. 6 (1) , 5-20
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026540758900600101
Abstract
A review of previous research suggested a three-way interaction effect between gender of discloser, locus of evaluation of discloser and partner in influencing disclosure intimacy. A social exchange model predicted the specific structure of the interaction. Application of the model yielded four distinct theoretical intimacy investment levels. Fifty five males and fifty-five females responded to the locus of evaluation questionnaire and completed the Davis (1976) acquaintance exercise in male-female dyads. Using a median-split method, participants were labelled as internal or external evaluators. Results provided support for the predicted interaction effect and for the social exchange model. Results are discussed in terms of social exchange theory and the costs and benefits of intimacy, power and their intersection in the development of close relationships between women and men.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of biological sex and psychological gender on reported and behavioral intimacy and control of self‐disclosureCommunication Quarterly, 1986
- Disclosure as social exchange: Anticipated length of relationship, sex roles, and disclosure intimacyWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 1985
- Gender Effects in an Initial Encounter: A Case Where Men Exceed Women in DisclosureJournal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1985
- Variables Affecting the Perception of Self-Disclosure AppropriatenessThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1983
- Physical Distance, Sex, and Intimacy in Self-DisclosurePsychological Reports, 1982
- When boy meets girl: Sex roles and the negotiation of intimacy in an acquaintance exercise.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- A Multidimensional Look at Sex and Target Differences in DisclosurePsychological Reports, 1976
- Self-disclosure in an acquaintance exercise: Responsibility for level of intimacy.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- "openness" as a dimension of projective test responses.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967
- Peer-Group Structure and a Child's Verbal Accesibility in a Treatment InstitutionSocial Service Review, 1962