Aerosol Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production: Mobile Direct-Reading Sampling
Open Access
- 6 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Occupational Hygiene
- Vol. 54 (5) , 514-531
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq015
Abstract
Detailed investigations were conducted at a facility that manufactures and processes carbon nanofibers (CNFs). Presented research summarizes the direct-reading monitoring aspects of the study. A mobile aerosol sampling platform, equipped with an aerosol instrument array, was used to characterize emissions at different locations within the facility. Particle number, respirable mass, active surface area, and photoelectric response were monitored with a condensation particle counter (CPC), a photometer, a diffusion charger, and a photoelectric aerosol sensor, respectively. CO and CO2 were additionally monitored. Combined simultaneous monitoring of these metrics can be utilized to determine source and relative contribution of airborne particles (CNFs and others) within a workplace. Elevated particle number concentrations, up to 1.15 × 106 cm−3, were found within the facility but were not due to CNFs. Ultrafine particle emissions, released during thermal treatment of CNFs, were primarily responsible. In contrast, transient increases in respirable particle mass concentration, with a maximum of 1.1 mg m−3, were due to CNF release through uncontrolled transfer and bagging. Of the applied metrics, our findings suggest that particle mass was probably the most useful and practical metric for monitoring CNF emissions in this facility. Through chemical means, CNFs may be selectively distinguished from other workplace contaminants (Birch et al., in preparation), and for direct-reading monitoring applications, the photometer was found to provide a reasonable estimate of respirable CNF mass concentration. Particle size distribution measurements were conducted with an electrical low-pressure impactor and a fast particle size spectrometer. Results suggest that the dominant CNF mode by particle number lies between 200 and 250 nm for both aerodynamic and mobility equivalent diameters. Significant emissions of CO were also evident in this facility. Exposure control recommendations were described for processes as required.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part AJournal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2009
- Inhalation vs. aspiration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in C57BL/6 mice: inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and mutagenesisAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 2008
- Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot studyNature Nanotechnology, 2008
- Evaluation of a Proposed Area Equation for Improved Exothermic Process ControlAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2007
- A simple and inexpensive dilution system for the TSI 3007 condensation particle counterAtmospheric Environment, 2007
- Characterization and Mapping of Very Fine Particles in an Engine Machining and Assembly FacilityJournal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2007
- In situstructure characterization of airborne carbon nanofibres by a tandem mobility–mass analysisNanotechnology, 2006
- Using multiple continuous fine particle monitors to characterize tobacco, incense, candle, cooking, wood burning, and vehicular sources in indoor, outdoor, and in-transit settingsAtmospheric Environment, 2006
- Comparing aerosol surface-area measurements of monodisperse ultrafine silver agglomerates by mobility analysis, transmission electron microscopy and diffusion chargingJournal of Aerosol Science, 2005
- Mass, surface area and number metrics in diesel occupational exposure assessmentJournal of Environmental Monitoring, 2005