On Validating a Relationship Between Constructs
- 1 April 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 36 (1) , 111-121
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447603600110
Abstract
An obtained relationship between two empirical variables may mean that (a) they both reflect the same theoretical construct or that (b) they reflect different constructs which are related. It is suggested that the demonstration of shifting, nonmonotonic, and/or asymmetric relationships provides evidence for rejecting hypothesis (a). Demonstrating that the variables are differentially related to a third variable, factor analysis, corrections for attenuation, and a multitrait-multimethod approach appear to be limited ways of generating information useful for choosing between hypotheses (a) and (b).Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing if two measuring procedures measure the same dimension.Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- Problems with the use of "moderator" variables.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Note on choosing between competing interpretations of cross-lagged panel correlations.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Some Theoretical and Empirical Results Related to McNemar's Test that the Population Correlation Coefficient Corrected for Attenuation Equals 1.0American Educational Research Journal, 1970
- Continuity and change in personality.American Psychologist, 1969
- More plausible rival hypotheses in the cross-lagged panel correlation technique.Psychological Bulletin, 1969
- Methods for determining equivalence of measures.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Techniques for estimating the source and direction of causal influence in panel data.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955