Feminism, Realism, and Universalism
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Feminist Economics
- Vol. 5 (2) , 25-59
- https://doi.org/10.1080/135457099337932
Abstract
Feminists have drawn attention to, and rightly criticized, the tendency of dominant groups unthinkingly to universalize their own values and practices. In so doing, however, many feminists have appeared inclined to criticize almost any practice of generalizing, a development that has proven problematic for feminist epistemological and emancipatory projects. Such considerations invite a questioning of how, if at all, the general and the particular are, or might legitimately be, combined in any context. The argument here is that addressing this sort of question can benefit from a more explicit attention to ontology than is to be found in much of the feminist literature. Illustrations of how ontology can make a difference are developed.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Focus Groups: Contributing to a Gender-Aware MethodologyFeminist Economics, 1997
- Robinson Crusoe: The quintessential economic man?Feminist Economics, 1995
- Social/institutional variables and behavior within households: An empirical test using the Luxembourg income studyFeminist Economics, 1995
- Gender, sexuality, and sexual orientation: All in the feminist family?Feminist Economics, 1995
- Can feminist thought make economics more objective?Feminist Economics, 1995
- A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980sPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- Troubled Pleasures: Writing on Politics, Gender and HedonismFeminist Review, 1992
- Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1992
- Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.Patricia Hill CollinsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1991
- Can There Be A Feminist Science?Hypatia, 1987