Dead Reckoning: Demographic Determinants of the Accuracy of Mortality Risk Perceptions
- 22 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 24 (3) , 651-664
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00465.x
Abstract
General patterns of bias in risk beliefs are well established in the literature, but much less is known about how these biases vary across the population. Using a sample of almost 500 people, the regression analysis in this article yields results consistent with the well-established pattern that small risks are overassessed and large risks are underassessed. The accuracy of these risk beliefs varies across demographic factors, as does the switch point at which people go from underassessment to overassessment, which we found to be 1500 deaths annually for the full sample. Better educated people have more accurate risk beliefs, and there are important differences in the risk perception by race and gender that also may be of policy interest.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socioeconomic Determinants of Health‐ and Food Safety‐Related Risk PerceptionsRisk Analysis, 2001
- Jurors, Judges, and the Mistreatment of Risk by the CourtsThe Journal of Legal Studies, 2001
- How do Judges think about risk?American Law and Economics Review, 1999
- Gender and Environmental Risk ConcernsEnvironment and Behavior, 1996
- Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health RisksRisk Analysis, 1994
- Demographic Influences on Risk PerceptionsRisk Analysis, 1993
- An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perceptionAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1992
- On Judging the Frequency of Lethal Events: A Replication Engineering and Public Policy/Carnegie‐Mellon University Graduate Research Methods Class1Risk Analysis, 1983
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Judged frequency of lethal events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978