Disinfection Practices for Endoscopes and Other Semicritical Items
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 12 (5) , 282-288
- https://doi.org/10.2307/30145194
Abstract
Objective: To determine the disinfection practices employed by North Carolina hospitals for endoscopes and other semicritical patient care items and to discuss minimally acceptable disinfection procedures for these items. Design: A survey questionnaire was mailed to all North Carolina hospitals to identify their disinfection practices, and a literature review was conducted to ascertain studies that evaluated disinfection techniques for certain semicritical items. Participants: Questionnaires were returned by 107 of 167 (64%) North Carolina acute-care hospitals. ResultS: Most hospitals (91%) used a glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant (59%, 2% glutaraldehyde; 29%, 0.13% glutaraldehyde-0.44% phenol-0.08% phenate; 3%, either); half (51%) of the hospitals immersed the endoscope into disinfectant for ≥ 20 minutes, but 44% immersed for ≤ 10 minutes; nearly all hospitals (97%) disinfected endoscopes at room temperature. Hospitals rinsed the endoscope with sterile water (16%), tap water (54%), tap water followed by alcohol rinse (27%), or other (2%); 58% of the hospitals treated endoscopes from patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or Mycobacterium tuberculosis differently (81%, ethylene oxide [ETO] sterilization; 10%, increased exposure time; 10%, other). Twenty percent of the hospitals used an automated washer for processing endoscopic instruments. Rigid endoscopes (e.g., arthroscopes, laparoscopes) were primarily high-level disinfected (57%), ETO sterilized (17%), or either (13%). The disinfection strategies for other semicritical items (e.g., applanation tonometers, cryosurgical instruments, and diaphragm fitting rings) were highly variable for the responding hospitals. Conclusions: This survey indicated the presence of a wide variety of practices for handling semicritical patient care items, many of which are inconsistent with current recommendations. To help establish minimally acceptable disinfection procedures for some patient care instruments (e.g., arthroscopes, laparoscopes, tonometers), the scientific literature was reviewed and recommendations were made.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Elimination of high titre HIV from fibreoptic endoscopes.Gut, 1990
- APIC guideline for selection and use of disinfectantsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1990
- CONTAMINATION OF ENDOSCOPES USED IN AIDS PATIENTSThe Lancet, 1989
- Routine cleaning and the elimination of Campylobacter pylori from endoscopic biopsy forcepsJournal of Hospital Infection, 1989
- Chemical colitis due to endoscope cleaning solutions: A mimic of pseudomembranous colitisGastroenterology, 1988
- Mycobacterium chelonaeCausing Otitis Media in an Ear-Nose-and-Throat PracticeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Cleaning and disinfection of equipment for gastrointestinal flexible endoscopy: interim recommendations of a Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology.Gut, 1988
- Unrecognized Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Emergency Department PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Salmonella newport infections transmitted by fiberoptic colonoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1987
- Guideline for handwashing and hospital environmental control, 1985 supersedes guideline for hospital environmental control published in 1981American Journal of Infection Control, 1986