Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review
- 13 July 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 272 (2) , 92-94
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520020018004
Abstract
THREE great structural transformations are now taking place in the sciences. Thestructuresare the conditions, the building plan, the institutional relationships that underlie and shape the way sciences are done today.Transformationsaffect the structures radically yet systematically—in ways that preserve many of the original elements while creating a set of relationships fundamentally different. Structural transformations are probably impossible to resist. Their consequences are hard to predict. The first and most familiar of the transformations we can think of as internal to research and publishing: it comprises the declining standards and the growing, built-in tendency toward corruption of the peer-review and refereeing processes. The other two transformations we can describe as external to peer reviewsensu stricto: they are the transition from exponential growth of the sciences to a steady state, and the appearance and development of electronic publishing and electronic collaboration more generally. The three overlap and interact.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Varmus: the View from BethesdaScience, 1993
- Virtual Libraries, Complete With Journals, Get RealScience, 1993
- Publication by Electronic Mail Takes Physics by StormScience, 1993
- THE LIFEBLOOD OF BIOTECHNOLOGY: UNIVERSITY–INDUSTRY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFERPublished by Elsevier ,1991
- An Exercise in Foresight: The Research System in Transition--To What?Published by Springer Nature ,1990
- The International Organization of Scientific WorkPublished by Springer Nature ,1990
- The Future: Steady State or New Challenges?Published by Springer Nature ,1990
- Dealing with Conflicts of InterestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Patterns of evaluation in scienceMinerva, 1971