Modifications and substitutions of the RNA extraction module in the ViroSeq™ HIV‐1 genotyping system version 2: Effects on sensitivity and complexity of the assay

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Genotypic testing for HIV‐1 resistance to anti‐retroviral drugs has become accepted widely as a routine method to guide anti‐retroviral therapy. However, implementation into routine high‐throughput laboratory diagnosis is difficult due to the complexity of the assay. A commercially available assay is the ViroSeq™ HIV‐1 Genotyping System (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany). We modified and substituted the RNA extraction module to optimize the proportion of samples amplified successfully as follows: 1 ml plasma was concentrated by ultracentrifugation and extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions (Kit), by substituting the lysis buffer (Roche, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and by using the QIAamp Viral RNA Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) with elution volumes of 60 (Q60) or 50 μl (Q50). Overall Q50 showed a higher success rate (97%) than the other extraction modules used (range 88–91%). In samples with a viral load range of 1,000–4,999 copies/ml, Q50 was superior (95 vs. 65% to 83%), while in samples with a viral load range of 5,000–9,999 copies/ml or those with 10,000 or more copies/ml, the success rate of the extraction procedures showed no significant differences. In 18 samples, which were negative using the Kit or Roche extraction, Q60 resulted in 7/18 positive results; in addition the Q50 was successful in amplifying 7/10 of the Q60 negative samples. When investigating samples with a measurable viral load of less than 1,000 copies/ml or lower, Q50 had the highest success rate with 80% compared to the other procedures (33–63%). A statistically significant new cut‐off could be defined for Q50 at a value of 250 copies/ml. The results showed clearly that the ViroSeq System is suitable for analyzing the HIV‐1 genotype over a wide range of viral loads but could be improved significantly when substituting the RNA extraction module with Q50 without using a nested PCR protocol. This is of great importance as it avoids further time‐ and cost‐intensive steps. J. Med. Virol. 71:475–479, 2003.

This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit: