Feminism and Constructivism: Do Artifacts Have Gender?
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Vol. 20 (3) , 332-351
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000304
Abstract
This article explores possibilities for establishing dialogues between feminism and constructivism in the field of technology studies. Based on an overview of Norwegian feminist debates about technology, it indicates several points where feminism and constructivism meet and can mutually benefit from each other. The article critically examines feminist studies questioning the problems of technological determinism, social deternacnism, and essentialism. It criticizes constructivism for a lack of concern for gender and politics but holds that it is still possible to use theoretical tools from constructivism in feminist analyses. Fruitful dialogues require the application of the principle of symmetry to the dcalogues and sharing some common ground and mutual recognation of each other's strengths and weaknessesKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Handbook of Science and Technology StudiesPublished by SAGE Publications ,1995
- Do Not Despair: There Is Life after ConstructivismScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1993
- Excluding women from the technologies of the future?: A case study of the culture of computer scienceFutures, 1991
- Technology is Society Made DurableSociological Review, 1990
- Introduction: Monsters, Machines and Sociotechnical RelationsSociological Review, 1990
- Genderization of Technology among Norwegian Engineering StudentsActa Sociologica, 1987
- The Trade Unions ‐ New users of researchPersonnel Review, 1975