New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Journal of Political Economy
- Vol. 112 (4) , 779-816
- https://doi.org/10.1086/421169
Abstract
There are two striking aspects of the recovery from the Great Depression in the United States: the recovery was very weak and real wages in several sectors rose significantly above trend. These data contrast sharply with neoclassical theory, which predicts a strong recovery with low real wages. We evaluate the contribution of New Deal cartelization policies designed to limit competition and increase labor bargaining power to the persistence of the Depression. We develop a model of the bargaining process between labor and firms that occurred with these policies, and embed that model within a multi-sector dynamic general equilibrium model. We find that New Deal cartelization policies are an important factor in accounting for the post-1933 Depression. We also find that the key depressing element of New Deal policies was not collusion per se, but rather the link between paying high wages and collusion.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The role of investment-specific technological change in the business cycleEuropean Economic Review, 2000
- Labor-Market Policies in an Equilibrium Search ModelNBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1999
- Changes in the Cyclical Behavior of Real Wage Rates, 1870–1990The Journal of Economic History, 1996
- Three-and-a-Half Million U.S. Employees Have Been Mislaid: Or, an Explanation of Unemployment, 1934-1941Journal of Political Economy, 1976
- Unemployment in the Great Depression: Is There a Full Explanation?Journal of Political Economy, 1972
- A Statistical Study of Antitrust EnforcementThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1970