Effects of partial ventilatory support modalities on respiratory function in severe hypoxemic lung injury*
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 34 (6) , 1738-1745
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000218809.49883.54
Abstract
The early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by impaired respiratory mechanics, ventilation-perfusion mismatch, and severe hypoxemia. Partial ventilatory support can effectively unload the respiratory workload and improve pulmonary gas exchange with less hemodynamic compromise. The partial ventilatory support mode most indicated in early phases of ARDS has not been determined. This study compares the effects of assisted ventilatory techniques on breathing pattern, gas exchange, hemodynamic function, and respiratory effort with those of controlled mechanical ventilation in similarly sedated subjects. Prospectively randomized crossover animal study. Animal research laboratory. Eleven anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. Acute lung injury was induced by lung lavage. Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), pressure-controlled assisted ventilation (P-ACV), bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP), and pressure support ventilation (PSV) with equal airway pressures and sedation were applied in random order. Gas exchange, respiratory effort, and hemodynamic function were measured, and ventilation-perfusion distributions were calculated by multiple inert-gas-elimination techniques. The results revealed that partial ventilatory support was superior to PCV in maintaining adequate oxygenation and hemodynamic function with reduced sedation. The effects of P-ACV, BIPAP, and PSV were comparable with respect to gas exchange and hemodynamic function, except for a more pronounced reduction in shunt during BIPAP. P-ACV and PSV were superior to BIPAP to reduce respiratory drive and work of breathing. PSV affected the pattern of breathing and deadspace to a greater degree than did P-ACV. In acute lung injury, P-ACV preserves oxygenation and hemodynamic function with less respiratory effort compared with BIPAP and reduces the need for sedation compared with PCV.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ventilation with biphasic positive airway pressure in experimental lung injuryIntensive Care Medicine, 2004
- Influence of elevated abdominal pressure (EAP) on lung mechanics and gas exchange during PCV with and without spontaneous breathingCritical Care, 2004
- Maintaining spontaneous breathing efforts during mechanical ventilatory supportIntensive Care Medicine, 1999
- Spontaneous Breathing During Ventilatory Support Improves Ventilation–Perfusion Distributions in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1999
- Effect of Spontaneous Breathing Trial Duration on Outcome of Attempts to Discontinue Mechanical VentilationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1999
- Use of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs in Scientific Investigations Involving Animal SubjectsAnesthesiology, 1996
- Effect of Interfacing between Spontaneous Breathing and Mechanical Cycles on the Ventilation-Perfusion Distribution in Canine Lung InjuryAnesthesiology, 1994
- Ventilation-perfusion distributions during mechanical ventilation with superimposed spontaneous breathing in canine lung injury.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Long-term effects of two different ventilatory modes on oxygenation in acute lung injury. Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation and volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Phrenic Nerve Stimulation during Halothane AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1994