Fetal ECG: a novel predictor of atrioventricular block in anti-Ro positive pregnancies
Open Access
- 1 November 2007
- Vol. 93 (11) , 1454-1460
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.099242
Abstract
Approximately 2.8% of pregnancies are Ro/La antibody positive. 3-15% of fetuses develop complete heart block (CHB). First-degree atrioventricular heart block (1 degrees AVB) is reported in a third of Ro/La fetuses but as most have a normal postnatal ECG this may reflect inadequacies of Doppler measurement techniques. Comparison was made between mechanical (mPR) and electrical (ePR) intervals obtained prospectively using Doppler and non-invasive fetal ECG (fECG) in 52 consecutive Ro/La pregnancies in 46 women carrying 54 fetuses in an observational study at a fetal medicine unit. 121 mPR and 37 ePR intervals were recorded in 49 Ro/La fetuses. Five were referred with CHB and excluded. ePR was measured successfully in 35/37 (94%) and mPR was measured in all cases. 1 degrees AVB was defined as PR >95% CI. Logistic regression predicted abnormal final fetal rhythm from first mPR or ePR. The ePR model gave 66.7% sensitivity (6 of 8 final abnormal fetal rhythm cases were predicted correctly in fetuses >20 weeks) and 96.2% specificity. mPR gave 44.4% sensitivity (4 of 9 cases) and 88.5% specificity. Z scores for ePR (zPR) were calculated from 199 normal fetuses. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.754 to 1.007). A cut-off of 1.65 gave a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 95% for those with prolonged and normal ePR intervals, respectively. zPR is better than mPR at differentiating between normal and prolonged PR intervals, suggesting that fECG is the diagnostic tool of choice to investigate the natural history and therapy of conduction abnormalities in Ro/La pregnancies.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- PR interval: A comparison of electrical and mechanical methods in the fetusEarly Human Development, 2007
- Identifying an early marker for congenital heart block: When is a long PR interval too long? Comment on the article by Sonesson et alArthritis & Rheumatism, 2005
- Maternal Anti-Ro and Anti-La Antibody–Associated Endocardial FibroelastosisCirculation, 2002
- Outcome of children with fetal, neonatal or childhood diagnosis of isolated congenital atrioventricular blockJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Reference values for time intervals between atrial and ventricular contractions of the fetal heart measured by two Doppler techniquesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the fetal PR intervalThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Correlation between Electrocardiographic and Ultrasonographic Time-Interval Measurements in Fetal Lamb HeartPediatric Research, 2000
- Outcome of isolated congenital complete heart block diagnosed in utero.Heart, 1996
- Fetal complete heart block.Heart, 1988
- Maternal Antibodies against Fetal Cardiac Antigens in Congenital Complete Heart BlockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986