Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community.
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Vol. 98, 195-202
Abstract
Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry is a novel perimetric test that provides rapid screening (45 to 60 seconds) and full-threshold (4 to 5 minutes) testing for detection of vision loss. The purpose of this study was to determine the specificity and sensitivity of FDT perimetry for the detection of ocular disease. A total of 130 participants (257 eyes of 42 men and 88 women) recruited from the community completed FDT perimetry, standard achromatic automated perimetry (SAP), anterior segment biomicroscopy, tonometry, and dilated ophthalmoscopy. FDT results were considered abnormal if 1 point was abnormal (depressed below the 5% level on the screening protocol C-20-5). SAP was considered abnormal if the glaucoma hemifield test or pattern standard deviation was outside normal limits (P < .05) or a hemifield cluster of 3 depressed points on the pattern deviation probability plot (P < .05) was present. An abnormal eye examination was defined as the presence of an abnormality in the anterior segment, lens, or posterior segment that was likely to cause a visual field defect or the presence of glaucomatous or other optic neuropathy. The mean age (+/- SD) of participants was 55.5 years (+/- 10.3). Ethnic groups, as reported by participants, included 77 (59%) African Americans, 40 (31%) Caucasians, and 13 (10%) in other groups. On clinical examination, 116 eyes (45%) were normal, 9 eyes (3.5%) had a cataract with best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/30, 16 eyes (6%) had open-angle glaucoma, and 17 eyes (7%) had retinal findings or lesions that were likely to cause a visual field defect. For FDT perimetry, 22 (8.6%) of 257 tests were unreliable, and for SAP, 65 (25.3%) of 257 tests were unreliable. The sensitivity and specificity of FDT perimetry for detecting an abnormal clinical examination were 55% and 90% and for detecting an abnormal examination that included an abnormal SAP, 64% and 86%. FDP demonstrated reasonable discriminatory power for detecting eye disease.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field lossAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2000
- Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: Correlation with octopus perimeter indicesOphthalmology, 2000
- Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.Archives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1999
- Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry Using a 24-2 Stimulus Presentation PatternOptometry and Vision Science, 1999
- Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.1997
- Stereoscopic viewing of the retina needed to identify maculopathyBMJ, 1996
- Cost effectiveness of screening modalities must be determinedBMJ, 1996
- Screening for sight threatening eye diseaseBMJ, 1996
- Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool diabetic eye studyBMJ, 1995
- Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey.1993