Attorney Persuasion in the Capital Penalty Phase: A Content Analysis of Closing Arguments
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Social Issues
- Vol. 50 (2) , 125-147
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02413.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Life or death decisions: An analysis of capital jury decision making under the special issues sentencing framework.Law and Human Behavior, 1994
- On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation.American Psychologist, 1993
- Jury decision making in the capital penalty phase: Legal assumptions, empirical findings, and a research agenda.Law and Human Behavior, 1992
- Recent psychological approaches to the free will versus determinism issue.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology?Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 1988
- Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- Evidence evaluation in complex decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Effects of Forwarning of Persuasive Intent and Involvement on Cognitive Responses and PersuasionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979
- Dimensions of Compliance-Gaining Behavior: An Empirical AnalysisSociometry, 1967