Chemotherapy of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Methotrexate, and Procarbazine versus Cisplatin and Etoposide A Randomized Study
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 11 (5) , 566-571
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198810000-00012
Abstract
All consecutive eligible patients with non-small-lung carcinoma seen at Centra di Riferimento Oncologico and Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro were entered into a randomized chemotherapy study. Conditions of eligibility included advanced stage (stage III not amenable to radiation therapy or i.v.), measurable or evaluable lesions, age less than 70 years, performance status (PS) greater than 40, and no previous chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to either CAMP (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 i.v., adriamycin 20 mg/m2 i.v., methotrexate 15 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, procarbazine 100 mg/m2 orally from day 1 to day 10, every 4 weeks) or DE (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. for five consecutive days and etoposide 75 mg/m2 i.v. on the same days, every 3 weeks). Treatment was continued until progression. Out of the 136 patients randomized, 133 were eligible (CAMP 62, DE 71) and 108 evaluable. Patient characteristics included male/female ratio 57/5 (CAMP) and 61/10 (DE), median age of 60 years (CAMP) and 59 years (DE), PS ≥ 70 for 39 (CAMP) and 50 (DE), PS < 70 for 23 (CAMP) and 21 (DE), stage III for 18 (CAMP) and 15 (DE), and stage IV for 44 (CAMP) and 56 (DE). DE was superior to CAMP in terms of response rate, defined as responding/e valuable patient ratio (38.2% versus 20.8%); however, the responding/eligible patient ratio was not significantly different in the two groups. The superiority of DE tended to be more marked in stage III patients, in patients with PS ≥ 70, and in the squamous histological type. Toxicity was acceptable (one toxic death) and evenly distributed in the two treatment groups; only renal toxicity was prevalent in the DE group. Survival (all eligible patients) was significantly better in the DE than in the CAMP group. Whether DE chemotherapy is superior to a no-chemotherapy approach has not been evaluated in this study and remains to be determined.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- cis-platinum (DDP) and VP 16-213 (etoposide) combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A phase II clinical trialEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1984
- COMPARISON OF COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY PROGRAMS IN ADVANCED ADENOCARCINOMA LARGE CELL-CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG - A NORTH-CENTRAL-CANCER-TREATMENT-GROUP STUDY1984
- Combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, procarbazine (camp) in 64 consecutive patients with epidermoid bronchogenic carcinoma, limited disease: A prospective studyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1982
- CHEMOTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL BRONCHOGENIC-CARCINOMA - EST 2575, GENERATION-III, HAM VERSUS CAMP1981
- Evaluation of response criteria in advanced lung cancerCancer, 1979
- Metastatic non-oat-cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Therapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and procarbazine (CAMP)JAMA, 1978
- COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY FOR STAGE-IIIMO NON-OAT CELL BRONCHOGENIC CARCINOMA1978
- CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, ADRIAMYCIN, METHOTREXATE, AND PROCARBAZINE (CAMP) TREATMENT OF NON-OAT CELL BRONCHOGENIC CARCINOMA1978
- PLATINUM-BASED POLYCHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS DIANHYDROGALACTITOL IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER1977
- Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of DiseaseJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1959