Safety and efficacy of low-energy cardioversion of 500 patients using two different techniques
Open Access
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in EP Europace
- Vol. 3 (1) , 4-9
- https://doi.org/10.1053/eupc.2000.0137
Abstract
Aim To present some safety and efficacy issues of low-energy internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation from 500 consecutive procedures performed with two different techniques, using either two single-coil catheters, or a single twin-coil catheter. Methods and Results Low-energy internal cardioversion was carried out in 368 patients by means of two defibrillation catheters: the former was positioned in the right atrium and the latter either in the left pulmonary artery (212 patients), or in the distal coronary sinus (156 patients). In the remaining 132 patients, a single twin-coil catheter was positioned with the distal coil either in the pulmonary artery (75 patients) or in the coronary sinus (57 patients), while the proximal coil was in the right atrium. The external defibrillator delivered truncated biphasic shocks (6/6 ms, tilt 50%), with a voltage of 10–400 V. In 283 patients (57%) external cardioversion had been unsuccessfully tried before low-energy internal cardioversion. After a total of 1118 shocks, the overall success rate was 92·2% (91·3% with two catheters and 94·7% with the single catheter); the success rate was 93·4 and 91·3% with the coronary sinus and the pulmonary artery approach, respectively. The mean energy used was 6·5±3·4 J (voltage: 320±45 V); no difference was found between the twin catheter (6·3±3·1 J) and the single catheter approach (6·9±3·7 J), while the coronary sinus configuration required a significantly lower energy than the pulmonary artery configuration (5·6±2·9 vs 7·2±3·8 J, P Conclusions Low-energy internal cardioversion is a safe and effective procedure for converting chronic atrial fibrillation, confirmed by this large multicentre experience. The newly available twin-coil catheter seems to achieve a slightly better success rate compared with the traditional two-catheter technique, and is associated with the same safety profile.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Internal low-energy cardioversion: A therapeutic option for restoring sinus rhythm in chronic atrial fibrillation after failure of external cardioversionEP Europace, 1999
- Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation and Subsequent Maintenance of Sinus RbythmPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
- Pain Threshold for Low Energy Intracardiac Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation with Low or No SedationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
- Low energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation resistant to transthoracic shocks.Heart, 1996
- Efficacy and tolerability of transvenous low energy cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in humansJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Low‐Energy Internal Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation Resistant to External CardioversionJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1995
- Initial Experience with Intracardiac Atrial Defibrillation in Patients with Chronic Atrial FibrillationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1994
- Torsade de pointes complicating drug treatment of low‐malignant forms of arrhythmia: Four case reportsClinical Cardiology, 1994
- Left ventricular dysfunction due to atrial fibrillation in patients initially believed to have idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Left ventricular function in patients with atrial fibrillation before and after cardioversionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992