Sample size in qualitative research
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- focus on-qualitative-method
- Published by Wiley in Research in Nursing & Health
- Vol. 18 (2) , 179-183
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211
Abstract
A common misconception about sampling in qualitative research is that numbers are unimportant in ensuring the adequacy of a sampling strategy. Yet, simple sizes may be too small to support claims of having achieved either informational redundancy or theoretical saturation, or too large to permit the deep, case‐oriented analysis that is the raison‐d'etre of qualitative inquiry. Determining adequate sample size in qualitative research is ultimately a matter of judgment and experience in evaluating the quality of the information collected against the uses to which it will be put, the particular research method and purposeful sampling strategy employed, and the research product intended. ©1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The co-dependency concept: Does it offer a solution for the spouses of alcoholics?Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 1994
- Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Evaluation of Completeness and Confirmation PurposesImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1993
- Alternative Arguments for Generalizing From Data as Applied to Qualitative ResearchEducational Researcher, 1993
- Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological TriangulationNursing Research, 1991
- RACE AND CLASS BIAS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON WOMENGender & Society, 1988
- Statistically nonrepresentative stratified sampling: A sampling technique for qualitative studiesQualitative Sociology, 1986
- Naturalistic inquiryInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985
- From Everyday To Psychological Description: Analyzing the Moments of a Qualitative Data AnalysisJournal of Phenomenological Psychology, 1983