Which side was Becker on? Questioning political and epistemological radicalism
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Research
- Vol. 1 (1) , 91-110
- https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100105
Abstract
Howard Becker’s article ‘Whose side are we on?’ has been widely cited, and widely misunderstood. It has frequently been interpreted as recommending partisan research, or as suggesting that social research cannot be objective. This article examines Becker’s position in detail, arguing that while there are some ambiguities within it, what it proposes is neither epistemologically nor politically radical in the way that is frequently assumed. What is true, though, is that Becker believes that systematic and rigorous sociological research inevitably tends to have radical political implications. In addition, he adopts a form of cultural relativism, whilst holding on to a notion of objectivity that is grounded in a commitment to pragmatism.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Everett Hughes and the Chicago TraditionSociological Theory, 1996
- An Interview With Erving Goffman, 1980Research on Language and Social Interaction, 1993
- A PARTISAN VIEWJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1990
- Labelling theory: an investigation into the sociological critique of devianceEconomy and Society, 1977
- Beyond Mead: The Societal Reaction to DevianceSocial Problems, 1974
- Radical Politics and Sociological Research: Observations on Methodology and IdeologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1972
- Whose Side Are We On?Social Problems, 1967
- Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Theory and MethodSocial Problems, 1962
- Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of DelinquencyAmerican Sociological Review, 1957
- The Criminal Violation of Financial TrustAmerican Sociological Review, 1950