Abstract
In five E-maze experiments, rats were given a choice between receiving reward and nonreward in a situation where stimuli were correlated with reward outcome (predictable situation) vs. one where the stimuli were uncorrelated with reward outcome (unpredictable situation). Preference for the unpredictable situation occurred under the following conditions: small (one 37-mg pellet), immediate rewards; small, delayed (15 s) rewards, if the cues correlated with reward outcome were absent during the delay interval; large (15 pellets), immediate rewards if a difficult discrimination was required and if the stimulus predicting nonreward was present at the choice point. Preference for the predictable situation was strongest if reinforcement was delayed and large or the stimulus predicting reward was present at the choice point. A weaker preference for the predictable situation occurred if reinforcement was immediate and large and a simple discrimination was required or if reinforcement was large and delayed and the cues that correlated with reward outcome were absent during the delay interval. The results support the predictions of DMOD (Daly modification of the Rescorla-Wagner model), a mathematical model of appetitive learning.