Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in cancer clinical trials
Open Access
- 17 September 2002
- Vol. 95 (7) , 1577-1583
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10862
Abstract
BACKGROUND The literature continues to report low rates of accrual to cancer clinical trials. Previous studies have examined principally physician-related or patient-related barriers. Clinical research associates (CRAs) have a unique perspective on enrollment that has been explored very little. This study sought the views of CRAs on barriers and facilitators to accrual. METHODS Focus groups were held at six of eight tertiary cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Audiotapes of sessions were transcribed and subjected to content analysis by two of the authors. Emergent themes were identified. These themes are illustrated by representative quotes taken from the transcripts. RESULTS Factors that acted as barriers or facilitators were classified into physician-related, patient-related, or system-related factors. CRAs identified physician attitudes regarding patient participation as the principal physician-related barrier. Barriers, facilitators, and modifying factors that were related to patient involvement were discussed by CRAs. Patients seemed more knowledgeable about trials than in the past and were willing to participate. System factors were considered to have the greatest impact on the ability to accrue. CRAs identified increasing trial and pharmaceutical demands coupled with tight trial time lines. Time was seen as a diminishing resource. Greater demands not only affect specific clinical trial accrual but also affect general support for trials in the cancer center and hospital. CONCLUSIONS The impact of greater demands in a climate of decreasing health care resources is perceived by CRAs as having a negative affect on accrual. Consequently, the important process of translating potentially beneficial basic research findings into clinical practice is slowed. Cancer 2002;95:1577–83. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10862Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional surveyThe Lancet, 2001
- Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology: Understanding and Attitudes Predict Willingness to ParticipateJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Prospective Evaluation of Cancer Clinical Trial Accrual Patterns: Identifying Potential Barriers to EnrollmentJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Factors That Predict the Referral of Breast Cancer Patients Onto Clinical Trials by Their Surgeons and Medical OncologistsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Barriers to Participation in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Systematic ReviewPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Why don't cancer patients get entered into clinical trials? Experience of the Sheffield Lymphoma Group's collaboration in British National Lymphoma Investigation studiesBMJ, 1997
- Recruiting Minorities Into Clinical Trials Toward a Participant-Friendly SystemJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995
- Accrual to cancer clinical trials: Directions from the research literatureSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Obstacles to implementing cancer clinical trialsSeminars in Oncology Nursing, 1991
- Improving accrual into cancer clinical trialsJournal of Cancer Education, 1991