Response to Cellulase Treatment of Silage and Replacement of Barley by Unmolassed Sugar Beet Pulp in the Diets of Growing Cattle

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A timothy, meadow-fescue, red clover sward was ensiled in a farm scale silo to compare formic acid (FA) and cell wall degrading enzymes (E) (cellulase/glucose oxidase) as silage additive. In a feeding trial with 24 bulls, FA or E silage was offered ad libitum and supplemented with fish meal and either with barley (B), barley + unmolassed sugar beet pulp (BS) (1:1) or unmolassed sugar beet pulp (S). Both silages were well preserved, but fermentation in the E silage was more extensive. Dry matter (DM) intake was not significantly affected by additive or concentrate. The use of E silage reduced the digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), N-free extract (NFE) (ppppp<0.001) with S, and more clearly with E than with FA silage. The live weight gain was 54 g/d greater with FA than E silage, and 60–70 g/d greater with BS than B or S alone (not significant differences). E silage seemed to need different supplementation than FA silage. The effects of silage additive and composition of supplement on the animal performance are discussed.

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit: