The Association Between Clinical Findings on Physical Examination and Self-Reported Severity in Back Pain
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 22 (3) , 296-303
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199702010-00013
Abstract
A cross-sectional population-based study of back pain. To evaluate the association between clinical findings on physical examination and subjective severity in nonspecific back pain. Assessment of severity of back pain always has been controversial. Most studies evaluating the role of clinical findings in back pain have been hospital- or clinic-based, often representing a highly select population. This selection is avoided in the population-based approach of the present study. Approximately 4,000 German inhabitants of Lübeck, aged 25-74, were selected randomly from the local population registry and received a postal questionnaire. Those who reported "back pain today" (n = 1200) or "back pain within the past 12 months but no back pain before" (n = 75) were invited to come in for a clinical examination. Thirty-four physical measurements were taken. They were divided into four groups: static measurements, dynamic measurements, neurologic findings, and nonorganic physical signs. Self-reported severity of back pain was measured by a pain questionnaire and a 12-item activities of daily living list to assess functional disability. Within each of the four groups of physical measurements, those that corresponded best with the subjective severity of back pain could be identified (e.g., rotation, lateral flexion, and fingertip-floor distance; scoliosis, the position of the side plumb line, and pain on percussion of the spine; pseudo-Lasègue and hand muscle strength). Those that corresponded best could be differentiated statistically from less correlative measurements such as kyphosis and lordosis; flexion of the lumbar, thoracic, or cervical spine; abdominal muscle strength; and axial loading. The agreement between the classification of back pain severity based on clinical findings and the classification based on self-reports was moderate (kappa = 0.47). Assessment of severity in back pain can only partly be based on the clinical findings of a physical examination. There is a relatively weak agreement between the results of physical examination and the subjective reporting of pain and disability.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distinguishable Groups of Musculoskeletal Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Control Subjects Based on Physical Measures of the NIOSH Low Back AtlasSpine, 1994
- Grading the severity of chronic painPAIN®, 1992
- Determinants of Sciatica and Low-Back PainSpine, 1991
- 1989 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: Reproducibility of Physical Signs in Low-Back PainSpine, 1989
- Correlations of Spinal Mobility with Degree of Chronic Low Back Pain after Correction for Age and Anthropometric FactorsSpine, 1987
- Recognizing Specific Characteristics of Nonspecific Low Back PainClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1987
- Chronic Low Back Pain in Men 54 - 63 Years of AgeSpine, 1986
- Physical Measurements as Risk Indicators for Low-Back Trouble Over a One-Year PeriodSpine, 1984
- Assessment of Severity in Low-Back DisordersSpine, 1984
- Nonorganic Physical Signs in Low-Back PainSpine, 1980