5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial

This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:

• Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
  JAMA, 2005
• Do men benefit more than women from an interventional strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? The impact of gender in the RITA 3 trial
  European Heart Journal, 2004
• A long-term perspective on the protective effects of an early invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
• Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial
  Published by Elsevier ,2002
• Comparison of Early Invasive and Conservative Strategies in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes Treated with the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Tirofiban
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
• Myocardial infarction redefined—A consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction
  European Heart Journal, 2000
• Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial
  The Lancet, 2000
• CORONARY DISEASE: The pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes
  Heart, 2000
• Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study
  The Lancet, 1999
• Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration
  Published by Elsevier ,1994