The subjective assessment of cataract
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Vol. 9 (1) , 16-19
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1989.tb00798.x
Abstract
The medical treatment of cataract now appears to be a distinct possibility. A number of anti‐cataract formulations are being clinically tested, and more clinical trials are being planned. To obtain a true assessment of a drug's efficacy, a battery of tests are needed which can accurately assess cataract progress. A clinical trial of the proposed anti‐cataract drug Bendalina is being conducted. The six subjective methods used to assess cataract progression in the trial are presented. These are refractive error, LogMAR visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity, retinal visual acuity and displacement threshold hyperacuity. The reasons for using each technique and their method of measurement is explained.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti‐cataract formulation trialsOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1988
- Reliabilities of Alternate Measures of Contrast Sensitivity FunctionsOptometry and Vision Science, 1988
- The objective assessment of cataractEye, 1987
- Contrast sensitivity decline with ageing: A neural or optical phenomenon?Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1987
- Computer processing of ocular photographs — a reviewOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1987
- Observations on a maximum likelihood method of sequential threshold estimation and a simplified approximationPerception & Psychophysics, 1984
- Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric methodPerception & Psychophysics, 1983
- A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1982
- Estimates on probability functions: A more virulent PESTPerception & Psychophysics, 1978
- BIOMETRIE DU SEGMENT ANTERIEUR DANS LA CATARACTE SENILEActa Ophthalmologica, 1971