Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China's Industrial Sector in the 1990s? The Relative Importance of Structural Change and Intensity Change
Preprint
- 1 January 2001
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
There have been a variety of studies investigating the relative importance of structural change and real intensity change to the change in China's energy consumKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- China's GDP expenditure accountsChina Economic Review, 2001
- The 1997–1998 break in industrial statisticsChina Economic Review, 2001
- Why Has the Energy-Output Ratio Fallen in China?The Energy Journal, 1999
- Input–Output Anatomy of China's Energy Use Changes in the 1980sEconomic Systems Research, 1995
- Decomposition of industrial energy consumptionEnergy Economics, 1994
- Industry energy use and structural changeEnergy Economics, 1993
- The Energy Situation in ChinaThe China Quarterly, 1992
- Manufacturing energy use in eight OECD countriesEnergy Economics, 1991
- Decomposition of changes in energy intensityEnergy Economics, 1988
- Separating the Changing Composition of U.S. Manufacturing Production from Energy Efficiency Improvements: A Divisia Index ApproachThe Energy Journal, 1987