Multicenter Evaluation of the Vitek 2 Anaerobe and Corynebacterium Identification Card
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 46 (8) , 2646-2651
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00450-08
Abstract
The new anaerobe and Corynebacterium (ANC) identification card for Vitek 2 was compared with a 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16S) reference method for accuracy in the identification of corynebacteria and anaerobic species. Testing was performed on a Vitek 2 XL system with modified software at three clinical trial laboratories. Reproducibility was determined with nine ATCC quality control strains that were tested 20 times over a minimum of 10 days at all three sites. A challenge set of 50 well-characterized strains and 365 recent fresh and frozen clinical isolates were included in the study. The expected positive and negative biochemical well reactions were also evaluated for substrate reproducibility. All strains were tested with the ANC card, and clinical isolates were saved for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. All reproducibility tests yielded expected results within a 95% confidence interval, except for that with Corynebacterium striatum ATCC 6940, for which identification failed at one trial site. For the challenge isolates, there was 98% correct identification, 5% low discrimination, and 2% incorrect identification, and 0% were unidentified. For clinical strains, there was 95.1% correct identification, 4.9% low discrimination, and 4.6% incorrect identification, and 0.3% were unidentified. The 4.6% (17/365) of clinical isolates that were incorrectly identified consisted of 14 isolates that were correct at the genus level and three that were incorrect at the genus level. The new ANC card met all performance criteria within a 95% confidence interval compared to the identification performance by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Insect small nuclear RNA gene promoters evolve rapidly yet retain conserved features involved in determining promoter activity and RNA polymerase specificityNucleic Acids Research, 2006
- Usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system for identification of anaerobic Gram positive bacilli isolated from blood culturesJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2006
- Usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S Ribosomal DNA-Based Bacterial Identification System for Identification of Clinically Significant Bacterial Isolates with Ambiguous Biochemical ProfilesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Identification of predominant human and animal anaerobic intestinal bacterial species by terminal restriction fragment patterns (TRFPs): a rapid, PCR-based methodMolecular and Cellular Probes, 2001
- Evaluation of the Rapid ID 32A system for identification of anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli, excluding the Bacteroides fragilis groupClinical Microbiology & Infection, 1999
- Ribosomal DNA sequencing as a tool for identification of bacterial pathogensCurrent Opinion in Microbiology, 1999
- Comparison of BBL Crystal® ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for Identification of Anaerobic BacteriaZentralblatt für Bakteriologie, 1996
- A pyrolysis-mass spectrometry study of Corynebacterium spp.Journal of Medical Microbiology, 1990
- Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identificationPathology, 1988